Thanks Jan,
I was just reviewing some of the old posts to the mailing list and
found a good example. I'm out of the office for the next hour but will
try this when I get back in.
..FG..
On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 17:08 +0200, Jan Willamowius wrote:
> Hi Fred,
>
> both gatekeeper need a [Neighbor::...] section and a
> [RasSrv::Neighbors] section.
>
> I would also define a SendPrefix= if you want to send calls to that
> neighbor. ForwardLRQ=depends (the default) is usually better than
> ForwardLRQ=always.
>
> Regards,
> Jan
>
> Fred Gillette wrote:
> > So I built up a second gnugk and placed it behind my primary one. In the gateway.ini file of the parent I placed the following.
> >
> > [Neighbor::MagorH323GK2]
> > GatekeeperIdentifier=MagorH323GK2
> > Host=192.168.217.179
> > AcceptPrefix=*
> > ForwardLRQ=always
> >
> > And I modified my routing policy to say:
> >
> > [RoutingPolicy]
> > default=explicit,internal,neighbor,enum,srv,dns
> >
> > I call into the parent gnugk and the log says that the device I am calling is not registered. Is it not supposed to ask it's neighbor? Because the device I
> > am calling is registered there.
> >
> > ..FG..
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct
_______________________________________________________
Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users
Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
