Re: Routing Configurations Possible?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



thanks for the feedback folks,

I found that if I use this combination on each of the b2b GKs, I can get
the with-GK behaviour...
each GW registers with '*',
then, in each gnugk.ini,

[RoutingPolicy::OnARQ]
default=neighbor
[RoutingPolicy::OnLRQ]
default=internal
[RoutingPolicy::OnSetup]
default=internal

but yes, far easier to simply route each GW to the other with no GK I
guess...

thanks again,
Mark.

ps - is that an undocumented real feature that you mentioned, David?
when you say the '.' prefixes are not checked??
I thought they just matched ANY character/digit - no?



-----Original Message-----
From: David Dahlberg [mailto:david.dahlberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 02:25
To: GNU Gatekeeper Users
Subject: [SPAM] - Re:  Routing Configurations
Possible? - Email found in subject

Am Montag, den 22.03.2010, 15:03 -0600 schrieb Barker, Mark:
> 
> 1. call FROM any of the local h.323 endpoints (ep1, ep2, etc)
>    a) route to another local endpoint if registered, or
>    b) default to route to Gateway if otherwise not found

How does the GW register? 
Anyway just see to it, that the routing entry (prefix) of the GW is
generic enough and has a lower priority than the registered endpoints.

e.g.
| [RoutingPolicy]
| default=internal
|
| [RasSrv::PermanentEndpoints]
| 10.0.1.5=MyGW;.:=5

or
| [RoutingPolicy]
| default=internal
|
| [EP:GW1]
| GatewayPrefixes=.:=5
(the "dot prefixes" are not tested)

> 
> 2. call FROM GW
>    a) route to local endpoint if registered, or
>    b) fail call (NU)

RoutingPolicy: internal.


> non-h323---GW1---+----h323----+---GW2---non-h323
>                  |            |
>                 GK1          GK2
>                 
> The behaviour I need to see here is the following.
> 
> 1. call from GW1 (from its non-h323 side) should automatically try to
> route through GW2.
> 2. call from GW2 (from its non-h323 side) should automatically try to
> route through GW1.

I do not really understand this. Are there terminals registered to the
gatekeepers, too? Shall they be able to call to the non-H.323 networks
and if yes, on which policy do they decide which GW to use?

Otherwise I'd say, just configure the "partner gateway" on each GW --
this wouln't necessarily require any Gatekeepers at all.

Regards

David

-- 
David Dahlberg <david.dahlberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>    

Fraunhofer FKIE, Dept. Communication Systems (KOM) | Tel:
+49-228-9435-845
Neuenahrer Str. 20, 53343 Wachtberg, Germany       | Fax: +49-228-856277


------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________________

Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users
Unsubscribe:
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/

The information contained in this e-mail message is PRIVATE. It may contain confidential information and may be legally privileged. It is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this communication is strictly prohibited. If the intended recipient(s) cannot be reached or if a transmission problem has occurred, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and destroy all copies of this message. 
Thank you. 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________________

Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users
Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/

[Index of Archives]     [SIP]     [Open H.323]     [Gnu Gatekeeper]     [Asterisk PBX]     [ISDN Cause Codes]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux