Robert Kulagowski wrote: > Jan Willamowius wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I think its ok if the other gatekeeper answers LRJ to the monitoring >> check. It is just intended to see if the LRQs go through. >> >> You could add a permanent endpoint with alias >> "gatekeeper-monitoring-check" to make GnuGk respond with LCF, but I >> don't think you need to. > > OK, so is this just an artifact of having logging turned up to "5" while > I'm getting familiar with the system? > > This is actually good, because it means that I get to experiment more > with how the .ini file works. What I did was add this: [RasSrv::PermanentEndpoints] 10.23.10.222=gatekeeper-monitoring-check Which turned the LRJ into a LCF. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________________ Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
