Jan Willamowius wrote: > Hi, > > I think its ok if the other gatekeeper answers LRJ to the monitoring > check. It is just intended to see if the LRQs go through. > > You could add a permanent endpoint with alias > "gatekeeper-monitoring-check" to make GnuGk respond with LCF, but I > don't think you need to. OK, so is this just an artifact of having logging turned up to "5" while I'm getting familiar with the system? This is actually good, because it means that I get to experiment more with how the .ini file works. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________________ Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openh323gk-users Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
