Hi Zygmuntowicz,
Both gateway is permanent endpoint, actually not registered to GNUGK. Is
failover support permanent endpoint?
Regards,
Balgaa
----- Original Message -----
From: "Zygmuntowicz Michal" <m.zygmuntowicz@xxxxxxx>
To: <openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 6:13 PM
Subject: Re: Fail-over config question
As you can see from the log - only the first gateway matched
during prefix match - try to use the 'rv' command to check
if both gateways are registered and use the same prefix.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Balgansuren Batsukh" <balgaa@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 10:13 PM
Recently, we setup GNUGK-2.2.4 using CVS on FreeBSD-6.1-STABLE.
We did following on gnugk.ini:
====================
[RoutedMode]
GKRouted=1
H245Routed=1
CallSignalPort=1720
CallSignalHandlerNumber=100
RtpHandlerNumber=100
RemoveH245AddressOnTunneling=1
AcceptNeighborsCalls=1
AcceptUnregisteredCalls=1
SupportNATedEndpoints=1
DropCallsByReleaseComplete=1
RemoveCallOnDRQ=1
SendReleaseCompleteOnDRQ=1
ScreenDisplayIE=1
ScreenCallingPartyNumberIE=1
ForwardOnFacility=1
ShowForwarderNumber=1
Q931PortRange=20000-20999
H245PortRange=30000-30999
SignalTimeout=60000
SingleFailoverCDR=FALSE
ActivateFailover=1
FailoverCauses=1-15,21-127
[RoutingPolicy]
default=explicit,internal
[Proxy]
Enable=0
T120PortRange=40000-40999
RTPPortRange=50000-59999
ProxyForNAT=0
[RasSrv::GWRewriteE164]
dentel1=out=089=777;out=090=888;out=047=777;out=099=777
dentel2=out=089=777;out=090=888;out=047=777;out=099=777
;honduras=out=047=78943504;out=099=78943504
[RasSrv::RewriteE164]
;1100003=08935569
1100003=09035569
52627=777
;089=777
;090=888
089976=3333976
;047=7771
;0991=7771
047504=78943504
099504=78943504
[RasSrv::GWPrefixes]
[RasSrv::PermanentEndpoints]
x.x.9.12=ASIATEL_GK1;076,777,0331,9864266
y.y.y.150=dentel1;777,888,089,090,047,099
z.z.z.175=dentel2;777,888,089,090,047,099
a.a.a.234=honduras;78943504
b.b.b.7=micom_gw7;3333976
c.c.c.114=ASIATEL_GW1;047976,099976;3333976
Connection diagram:
==============
GW------->GNUGK-------->b.b.b.7, c.c.c.114 with 333976 prefix.
I disabled all E1 ports on b.b.b.7 gateway, then I make test call from
gateway and get routed to b.b.b.7, but call reject with "Unallocated
number" because of E1 port. Actually, I guess call fail-over support to
work and move to second gateway, but unfortunately didn't. It is
immediately release completed.
-------------------------------------------------------
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642
_______________________________________________________
Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549
Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
-------------------------------------------------------
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642
_______________________________________________________
Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549
Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
