Re: Gnugk 2.2.4 audio problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Did anyone test the fix ?

Is the "No audio" bug trully solved ? :)



----- Original Message ----- From: "Zygmuntowicz Michal" <m.zygmuntowicz@xxxxxxx>
To: <openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 1:45 PM
Subject: Re:  Gnugk 2.2.4 audio problem


I just committed a fix to this problem (uninitialized m_unregNAT
CallRec variable in RasTbl.cxx). Please try the latest cvs version,
when it gets updated with the fix.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Lucian Gheorghe" <lucian@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 9:01 PM


I had the same problem with the "No audio" bug.

About the failover support - it seems to work randomly and only for low volume of traffic. For instance, I routed a number through a few gateways that didn't had a route to that number and I placed the gateway that had the route to the number the latest in priorities. Sometimes it worked, sometimes it failed over a few gws (2,3,4) and sometimes it didn't failed over at all, refusing the call after the first gateway did. As a pattern, I noticed that failover works better when traffic volumes are very low.

Another thing is that gnugk failover works only for internal routing, so, for instance if I have a peer that sends LRQ instead of call signalling to gnugk, failover won't work (of course). But, it would be interesting to have something like:

GK ----- LRQ----- GnugK ------ LCF ----- GnugK(gateway mode) ----- my gateways

could this work if the GnugK(gateway mode) doesn't proxy the calls ?



----- Original Message ----- From: "Zygmuntowicz Michal" <m.zygmuntowicz@xxxxxxx>
To: <openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 3:04 PM
Subject: Re:  Gnugk 2.2.4 audio problem


You're probably right. We are working on a solution right now.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Dario Nul" <dario7@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 5:54 AM


I tried 2.2.4, but had audio problems, even though I do not use full proxy.

After looking at CDRs, I noticed the Media IP field sometimes has 127.0.0.1

could this be the problem?

Other times, the field has correct IP address of media.

any ideas?



-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________________

Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549
Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/




-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________________

Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549
Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/

[Index of Archives]     [SIP]     [Open H.323]     [Gnu Gatekeeper]     [Asterisk PBX]     [ISDN Cause Codes]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux