Samuel, <kid> Sorry, but You got only half of the idea.... ;) </kid> The basis are right, but why didn't You put a parent GK in front of the GK-neighbors? So, as Jan pointed out in a previuous e-mail, You could let this GK ack like a Gatekeeper Directory, only routing all calls to the GK-Proxy-farm (the neighbords)based on individual capacity? The load-balancing issue/requirement didn't show me as an realy important think. You have to be able to proxy all this traffic, that's important. But even so, remender that GK has a priority parameter. Playing with the GD concept, Proxy-farm, EndPoint capacity and EndPoint priority I suppose that You are done... Let me know how this goes on... ;) Edson. > -----Original Message----- > From: openh323gk-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:openh323gk- > users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Samuel Schmidlin > Sent: quarta-feira, 26 de abril de 2006 12:18 > To: openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: load balancing for a 1000 concurrent calls > flow > > Hi Edson, > > > Thanx for your reply. > > Actually we're thinking about replacing a softswitch (Nextone) with an > architecture based on GnuGk. > All gatekeepers will be centralized. It's a centralized architecture. > > So, will the neighbors architecture be the best to do load balancing with > a > centralized architecture? > > Our architecture is like that: > > GW origin 1 GW termin 1 > \ / > \ / > \ / > \ __________ / > | GKs | > |(neighbors) | > |__________| > / \ > / \ > / \ > / \ > GW origin N (e.g. 100) GW termin N (e.g. 200) > > > N.B: each endpoint (e.g. gateway) can have several calling plans. > > > Can you please put me on track on how doing load balancing with neighbour > architecture? > Or how to do load balancing with the most appropriated method (neighbour, > parent-child, alternate, linux virtual server) > > > Samuel. > > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : openh323gk-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:openh323gk-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de Edson > Envoyé : mercredi 26 avril 2006 15:47 > À : openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Objet : RE: load balancing for a 1000 concurrent calls > flow > > Why didn?t You look for a solution using neighbors, so that all resolvs > the > same routes, and define EP capacity from every GW that You will use? > > Edson. > > ________________________________________ > From: openh323gk-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:openh323gk-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of samuel > schmidlin > Sent: quarta-feira, 26 de abril de 2006 09:14 > To: openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: load balancing for a 1000 concurrent calls > flow > > Hi to all, > > > I read the parent ? child approach, and the alternate GK approach to do > load > balancing. > Between these 2 methods which one is more appropriated for load balancing? > > As I told you before we have a traffic of about 1000 concurrents calls in > proxy mode. So I guess we would need a lot of GKs. > > I?m thinking about an architecture like this: > > Child GK1 > / . > / . > / . > Parent GK /_ _ _ Child GK4 > \ . > \ . > \ . > \ Chid GK n (maybe 10 or even more) > > > We have to route calls from originating H323 gateways to terminating H323 > gateways. > Is this architecture a good solution for that kind of routing? > > I read about the Linux Virtual Server Project. > Is this project compatible with the parent ? child approach in GnuGk, or > is > it a completely different project? > If compatible, how to use GnuGk and Linux Virtual Server together? > > Thanx for your help. > > > Best regards, > Samuel > > > Tel: +33-556-861-622 > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job > easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=k&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642 > _______________________________________________________ > > Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id?49 > Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users > Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/ > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job > easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=k&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642 > _______________________________________________________ > > Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id?49 > Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users > Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/ ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd_______________________________________________________ Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id?49 Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
