Zygmuntowicz Michal wrote (on Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 10:26:58AM +0200): > If all machines are NATed, maybe the public machines > receives a private address for media. Hmmm ... unsure what you mean by "for media." The same machines, NATed (and they are smart enough to know they are NATed, BTW) communicate just fine when unregistered. FW shows ASSURED connections in both directions with target. Side question: I need test callers from the outside, to test my arrangements. Even better if the outside callers could be controlled from the inside; hence, a command line would be ideal. What's the simplest setup to test a H.323 connection? Thanks! > >Zygmuntowicz Michal wrote (on Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 01:50:09AM +0200): > >>You can either: > >>1. Use the external ACD application (see www.gnugk.org). > >>2. Define a few gateways for the same prefix with capacity = 1 and > >>priority = 1. > >> An incoming call will be routed to the first available gateway. > >>3. Use your own external scripts to route calls. > > > >I started using GnuGK tonight. First roadblock: apparently, when the > >registered H.323 place calls, they are unable to receive video. > > > >A word about my setup: both the gatekeeper and the video machines are > >static NAT'ed; opening up ports did not help. The Tandbergs show, on a > >call to an external loopback, transmission of video but no reception. > > > >Can anyone figure out why, on the limited facts I've provided? > > > >To the big picture: would someone out there care to take on a consulting > >gig and help me get this all together? I'm in NYC but would be willing to > >deal with someone telecommuting ... I'm at <awacs@xxxxxxxxxx>. > > > >Thanks! > > > >>>... I have a bunch of H.323 machines, all functionally equivalent (i.e., > >>a >call center of sorts) and until now I've just published a list of IPs > >>and >hoped that whatever one the caller picked would get answered. > >>> > >>>Now, there's enough of them that this is getting cumbersome. SO, I'd like > >> > >>>a device that would accept an incoming call and route it to any available > >> > >>>machine - dosen't matter which one, really. I thought that a gatekeeper > >>>would do this, but the commercial gatekeeper that we purchased earlier > >>does >NOT do this. Oh, well. > >>> > >>>So, does this gatekeeper do this? Does any other, that anyone knows of? > >>>Or, do I need an entirely different machine? > >>> > >>>Thanks! -- _________________________________________ Nachman Yaakov Ziskind, FSPA, LLM awacs@xxxxxxxxxx Attorney and Counselor-at-Law http://ziskind.us Economic Group Pension Services http://egps.com Actuaries and Employee Benefit Consultants ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________________ Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
