We're not seeing an issue with simultaneous calls -- hundreds are not a
problem. Remember, we're not proxying or h245 routing.
We're topping out at about 5 setups/sec.
You mention FreeBSD here -- is Linux better at this?
I didn't really think that h323 was this heavy of a protocol that a xeon
3.4 couldn't tear through this. Seems odd.
It's setups that are a problem.
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Jan Riedinger wrote:
Hello Alex!
I dont think you can handle such many calls with gnugk. I'm using it at a
dual xeon 3.4 GHz and it can handle 130-170 simultanous calls at maximum.
However, only a single CPU is used, because with FreeBSD 5.4 gnugk can handle
only very few calls (10-30) with a SMP kernel. If you assume an average call
duration of only 120 that are not more than 1-2 new calls per second in
average.
--
Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex@xxxxxxx, latency, Al Reuben
Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________________
Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549
Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
