Chisanga, Evans wrote:
Hi Piotrek,
You said:
You have to add the neighbor Gnu1 on OtherGk so it will now the
neighbor it is replying to.
Well, I don't think that is quite it because if I bypass CiscoGK2 and
configure OtherGK as neighbour on GnuGK, it works fine.
You said:
The reason of your problems is
that cisco doesn't forward the response...
Very possible. Has anyone got this working? Antonnio Pinizzotto, does
yours work? Can you share some tips?
Hi,
sorry for my late answer.
Yes, it works!!
I used these two options:
[RasSrv::LRQFeatures]
ForwardLRQ=always
ForwardResponse=1
Actually, if I set ForwardLRQ=depends it doesn't work but I have to
investigate more deeply why not.
But I verified that setting ForwardResponse=1 the gnugk forwards the
received LRQ changing the replyAddress with its (gnugk's) IP address. In
this way the Cisco GK neighbor accepts the LRQ and forwards it
correctly. (refers to my previous email " Forwarded
LRQ rejected from a third part GK" for layout details).
Antonio
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________________
Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549
Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
