Thanks Michal, for your quick response. I tried the AcceptUnregisteredCalls=1 and added the following for my terminal: [RasSrv::PermanentEndpoints] xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx=1723 But, when I try dialing from OpenPhone using the DestNum + Gateway feature, the call fails, saying it is busy. Any idea why it's happening? Thank you once again for you input. Regards HASSAAN On 5/24/05, Zygmuntowicz Michal <m.zygmuntowicz@xxxxxxx> wrote: > 1) is currently not implemented. > 2) Try AcceptUnregisteredCalls=1. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Nyamul Hassaan" <mnhassan@xxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 5:18 AM > > > I've just started playing with GnuGK, and I have to say it is a superb piece > of code. It has worked pretty stable for me for over 7 days now, in proxy > mode. > > Special thanks to all the people in the forum, who has already asked / solved > problems that I've faced during installation. > > However, I have found 2 obstacles, that is limiting what I want to do. > Perhaps, what I want to do is over ambitious, and doesn't go with the > Gatekeeper concept. But, I'm putting them here to see what others think. > > 1. SAME ENDPOINT REGISTERING MULTIPLE TIMES > > I have some terminating gateways, that are configured to terminate multiple > routes. Say, there are 24 channels on the gateway, of which 12 are for Route1, > 8 for Route2 and 4 for Route3. > > Under current setup, I have to tell GnuGK that this endpoint can terminate all > Route1 + Route2 + Route3 prefixes, and, have a Capacity=24. But, that doesn't > tell GnuGK to stop sending the 13th call on Route1 to this box, or the 9th on > Rotue2, etc. > > I tried setting up the same IP on PermanentEndPoint with different aliases, > and respective prefixes, but GnuGK only takes the 1st occurence of the IP. > Can this be actually done? If not, was this done by choice? Can we get around > this, and have GnuGK search for unique aliases, instead of IPs? > > 2. ORGINATING ENDPOING MUST REGISTER > > The scenario where I want to install GnuGK is as a middlepoint for my > originating customers and terminating gateways. In case of terminating > gatewasy, I can go around not setting up the gateways to register to my box, > by adding them in Permanent Endpoints. But, in case of the originating > gateways, it appears, they must register explicitly with my gatekeepr. Am I > doing something wrong? Or, is this currently doable? If not, am I asking for > something that breaks the Gatekeeper concept? Could someone shed some light > on this please? > > Thank you in advance for your input. > > With regards > HASSAAN > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo. > Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo! > Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own > Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005 > _______________________________________________________ > > Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 > Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users > Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/ > > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo. Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo! Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr_______________________________________________________ Posting: mailto:Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id?49 Unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openh323gk-users Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
