Re: NATedEndpoint some Questions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



1) No.
2) It adds some overhead, but with novadays machines this is not a 
bottleneck usually.
3) Using non standard ports (both for RAS and signalling) solves the problem
     with routers that mess up with H.323.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Raschel" <raschel@xxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 9:32 AM


> Dear all,
>
> with NATedEndpoint Section we was able to fix most of the common 
> NAT-Router
> problems. Please allow me some more questions about this.
>
> 1.) is it possible to treat every client as NATedEndpoints in general with
> [NATedEndpoints]
> *=true
>
> 2.) i realized that it doesn´t matter whether a NAT-Router is Bogus or 
> not,
> all Routers are working with a Phone setup as NATedEnpoints
> but what would happen if a real public Endpoint is setup as NATedEndpoint
> and
> does the rewriting cause a heavy processing overhead?
>
> 3.) With registering at 1719 it is obviously not possible to recognize a 
> NAT
> Router which is rewriting the packets and claims to be a public Endpoint.
>
> For that it is not possible for gnugk to treat the Endpoint as a NAT
> Endpoint and at the Channel Setup the packets are not rewritten from 
> private
> to public ip which cause a faulty connection. Please correct me if i am 
> not
> right.
>
> So obviously there must be a stage where packets are exchanged which
> negotiate with a private IP. (Q.931/H.225/H245 ???)
>
> Isn´t it possible to initiate such a negotiation once at registration 
> stage
> to detect automatically that the Enpoint is behind a NAT Router ?
>
> 4.) With the growing circulation of SIP this problem might occur more and
> more because SIP has exactly the contrary problem. With many Providers it
> would not work if the router doesn´t rewrite the packets. For that many
> Router manufacturers decide to rewrite SIP and H.323, but unfortunately 
> not
> completely at the higher layers. (could the use of 1721 instead of 
> standard
> 1720 maybe force this problem?)
>
> For explanation a thx in advance
>
> TOM



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click

_______________________________________________________

List: Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id?49
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/

[Index of Archives]     [SIP]     [Open H.323]     [Gnu Gatekeeper]     [Asterisk PBX]     [ISDN Cause Codes]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux