Pe 21 Feb 2005, la 13:11, Jan Willamowius <jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a scris: >> What is the deal with gnugk 2.0 and 2.2? Is there a reason to use one >> and not the other? > >The only reason to use 2.0.x is the better H.235 implementation thta is >not yet in 2.2.x (and maybe LDAP support). Most people are better of >using 2.2.x. Thanks. Any idea why the CVS version of 2.2.2 doesn't read the configuration file anymore? Anything I can do to narrow down the location of the bug? Things I forgot to mention: 1. I believe the command line parameters are read correctly as the trace log is being created where it should be and it is highly verbose (-tttttt) so the -t and -o options were read correctly. 2. I tried to create a new configuration with only [Gatekeeper::Main] Fourtytwo=42 and it still didn't work. 3. the verbose logs show nothing but the fact that gnugk started in default configuration mode. ---- Home, no matter how far... http://www.home.ro ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________________ List: Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
