Manda Costin wrote: > Pe 21 Feb 2005, la 12:47, Thomas Balsfulland <tbals@xxxxxxxxx> a > scris: > > > because of very curious errors with version 2.0.10 from cvs i try to > >test with cvs 2.0.9, but its the same problem. > > What is the deal with gnugk 2.0 and 2.2? Is there a reason to use one > and not the other? The only reason to use 2.0.x is the better H.235 implementation thta is not yet in 2.2.x (and maybe LDAP support). Most people are better of using 2.2.x. Regards, Jan -- Jan Willamowius, jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://www.gnugk.org/ ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________________ List: Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
