As you can see from the log, RRQ is fine. The problem is that GnuGk 2.2 has no full H.235 implementation yet and generates unsecured RCF. You should try either 2.0, which has full H.235 support or wait until it is ported to 2.2.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas Balsfulland" <tbals@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 11:37 AM
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 01:56:48PM +0100, Frank Fischer wrote:
> 2.2 version does not yet fully support H.235 Auth Procedure I. > You should try 2.0.9 (from the cvs), which has H.235 features > implemented correctly or wait until patches are ported to 2.2.
This problem also exists on 2.0.9.
Nevertheless i think it's a problem of the innovaphone.
Thomas: Did you check the tokenOID in the RRQ. Is it set correctly? It might
be, that the innovaphone does not send the correct information to let the
gatekeeper know about it's h.235 capabilities, so the gatekeeper does not
expect h.235 secured communication and does not reply with a tokenOID.
Greetings
Frank
hello frank,
i am not really sure how to check the tokenoid in the rrq. i am not very skilled in h.235 standard and i cant find any informations about nestedcryptotoken in the itu h.235 docs.
you can find the rrq from ip202 at http://www.ctrl-c.de/ip202-rrq, maybe you are able to see if rrq is correct. at http://www.ctrl-c.de/ip202-trace you can find the trace from the ip202.
thank you for your help.
gruss
thomas
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click
_______________________________________________________
List: Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
