|
In response to your personal opinion 2. I dont know if you work in the
international voip termination game, but i do. In this game we might
have up to 30 carriers that change thier international rates on a daily
basis and are constatnly moving from 1st least cost route to a lower
placement least cost route, for thousands of possible calling codes.
Furthermore, these carriers routes into countries are constantly
failing, or filling up. As a provider to my customers I have to try and
complete their call even if my first least cost route doenst work for
whatever reason. Some calls i roll to other routes as long as my margin
is still .001 per minute, but for other programs, like calling cards, i
have to complete the call no matter what, even if i am taking a loss.
so you can see, we need to have many carriers. now if a carrier
constantly fails calls we will open tickets and maybe stop doing
busniess with them, but the need for rolling is paramount. As far as
PDD, in the international game there is a much wider latitude for
acceptable PDD. Again, i dont know if you ARE involved in this game on a day to day basis. if you are then i am sure you know all this as well. thanks! PS: I have also noticed an increase in carriers re-mapping thier q931 codes to prevent thier customers from seeing "network congestion","no circuit available","unkown failure" to "user busy" or "user alerted, no answer" in order to prevent them from getting a bad reputation for having low capacity or poor availability. and since we deal with a lot of smaller carriers, not just MCI SPRINT etc, they tend to do what they can to keep our business. David Winter Senior Network Engineer Planet-Telecom, Inc. Tampa FL (813)901-5182 Office (813)864-3162 Direct (813)817-4204 Mobile (813)881-9762 Fax ------------------------------------------ AIM: mobofool ICQ: 3563403 MSN: dwinter@xxxxxx Y!: vt_fool Michal Zygmuntowicz wrote: To get this working (and included in the cvs) you need: 1. Make it working with H.245 tunneling enabled/disabled. 2. Make it working with/without fast start (reopen audio channels, etc). 3. Make it working in full proxy mode. 4. Make it working with various hardware platforms (each platform usually has some bugs/missing features that prevent call rerouting from working as expected). My personal opinion is: 1. It's nice to have a simple feature that detects offline gateways and enables some blackout timeouts for them - quite simple and very useful. 2. Having call rerouting on no circuits available (or similar error) usually means someone should change his provider or SLA. Besides it influences PDD and gives bad experience to the user. 3. Some current issues should be solved before implementing call rerouting. On Fri, 2004-06-25 at 15:28, Pavel Jezek wrote:seems to be most popular question, last time ;-) I thing, that currently this feature isn't available in GNUGK 2.0.8 nor 2.2 but maybe, is under development (?) PJ ----- Original Message ----- From: Sait KARALAR To: openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 2:30 PM Subject: least cost rounting and failed calls. Hi, Can anybody help me about least cost routing and failed calls (due to the network error and/or remote endpoint not respoding and/or endpoint have not enough port to handle call) have a solution ? contact with me at sait at karalar.com please. Current Version: gnugk 2.0.8 (linux binary with mysql, pgsql, radius, no ldap)------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com _______________________________________________________ List: Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8549 Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/ |
