Tuesday, March 23, 2004, 1:31:52 AM, ray wrote:
r> On Monday 22 March 2004 17:50, Thomas wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have this topology:
>> GK1-> GK2 -> GK3
>> Where GK2 is gnugk-2.2. GK1 and GK3's type is unknown.
>> GK2 runs in GK routed mode (and I have access only to it).
>> 1. GK1 is trying to make a call to GK2
>> 2. GK2 asks GK3
>> 3. GK3 responds with LCF
>> 4. GK2 sends LCF to GK1
>> 5. GK1 sends Q931 Setup
>> 6. GK2 rejects the call.
r> have you tried to set the hop count to 3 or 4 maybe.
r> also i have these settings enables.
r> ForwardHopCount=3
r> AcceptForwardedLRQ=1
r> ForwardResponse=1
r> ForwardLRQ=always
r> CiscoGKCompatible=1
Yes, I have thos options (ForwardHopCount=2).
This problem looks me strange:
2004/03/22 22:37:48.970 5 Routing.h(140) ROUTING Checking policy Explicit for request `e¸a.A. CRV=507
2004/03/22 22:37:48.970 5 Routing.h(140) ROUTING Checking policy Internal for request `e¸a.A. CRV=507
2004/03/22 22:37:48.970 5 Routing.h(140) ROUTING Checking policy Neighbor for request `e¸a.A. CRV=507
>From this I see that the message type was not recognised, on it's
place are some symbols (`e¸a.A.). I checked the sources and found,
that this is written in case the messageType variable doesn't match to
any of specified (e.g. Setup). From the received Setup message is
seen, that the Setup message was correct (in the meaning of the
messageType). But later somehow it went to be wrong. My feeling is
that the problem is in policy routing or before somewhere.
Can anybody help me, please?
Thanks in advance,
Thomas
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id70&alloc_id638&opĚk
_______________________________________________
List: Openh323gk-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id…49
Homepage: http://www.gnugk.org/
