On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Guillermo Rodriguez <guille.rodriguez@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think that asking to "help rather than complain" is a bit unfair. No, it's really not unfair at all. You are basically saying Andrew is doing a crappy job as a maintainer when in reality he's pretty much the only one developing GNU Classpath these days... On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Guillermo Rodriguez <guille.rodriguez@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > First of all I am not "complaining", I am trying to suggest that perhaps, > if time and resources are limited, the best way to spend them would be to > look for a successor. Thanks for the suggestion. We're going to just ignore it because it makes no sense. Once you answer the hypothetical question *who* should be the successor, you will understand why. On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Guillermo Rodriguez <guille.rodriguez@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Second, I am willing to help in any way I can, and already stated that. > Yes I can submit patches (and will do) although in my opinion this does > not address the underlying problem. I think that updating the website > (to help raise awareness and attract developers) would be much more > useful than sending patches to fix bugs or issues. I also think the website needs fixing. Are sources to it available somewhere and who is able to update it if someone actually sends a patch against it? - Pekka
