Re: Future blog

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/08/2010 08:02 PM, Ivan Maidanski wrote:

> I remember you (or someone else) had pointed me about of
> inconvenience of reading my patches in the form they were attached
> and I had promised to use ".diff.txt" file extension but forgot
> about it after a long delay. (there is such problem in, say, hpl.com
> mailing list where I frequently send my patches to; besides, I have
> no problem in opening the attachment in the link below in Firefox
> which I use). I apologies for the inconvenience and I'll try to keep
> in my mind that it's better to use .txt extension when posting to
> this ML.

And every ML, I would have thought.  What possible advantage could
there be in generating patch mails in which the patch doesn't appear
in the body of the mail?

Andrew.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Cryptography]     [Fedora]     [Fedora Directory]     [Red Hat Development]

  Powered by Linux