On 13:03 Wed 08 Dec , Andrew Haley wrote: > On 12/08/2010 12:57 PM, Mario Torre wrote: > > Il giorno mer, 08/12/2010 alle 13.45 +0200, Pekka Enberg ha scritto: > > > >> I completely agree. I have Ivan's patches locally and I'm planning to > >> go through them and resend them to the list unless he beats me to it. > >> > >> Pekka > >> > > > > If we were using mecurial we could use review board or webrew. > > We could, but these just introduce extra barriers: it's very easy > to just read a mail. Let's not get obsessed with tools: the issue > here is social, not technical. > I assume you meant webrev. It does indeed make the patch easier to browse, but on the downside it means you have to be able to open a web page (assuming it's stil available) rather than just having everything in the mail (and thus archived). I don't know review board, but I presume it's something similar? Let's keep things simple. > Andrew. > -- Andrew :) Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) Support Free Java! Contribute to GNU Classpath and IcedTea http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath http://icedtea.classpath.org PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net) Fingerprint = F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8
