Hi David,
Let me know if you any questions regarding the packaging of JamVM.
I'll be pleased to help as this is something that's needed doing for a
while...
Rob.
On 7/18/06, fchoong@xxxxxxxxxxx <fchoong@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Dalibor, Christian, Andrew,
Thanks for pointing out the wiki! I will try out gcj and CACAO after I am
done with JamVM ;)
David Fu.
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:55:20AM +0900, fchoong@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> Hi Christian, Dalibor,
>> sandbox.nihonsoft.org is a standard i386(32-bit) machine. There is no
>> problem with running firecat with Kaffe, except the slow execution
>> speed.
>> SableVM has some sort of problem with the chaining of classloaders, and
>> the server socket dies after a few minutes. I think these problems are
>> specific to the VM, and not GNU Classpath. I have tried JamVM a bit, and
>> it seems to be ok too(except the way it is packaged is not like a JDK).
>> I
>> think while some problems are trivial, others are not. But overall we
>> are
>> getting closer to being able to use Free Runtimes in production;)
>> David
>> Fu.
>
> Cool, thanks for the update. You could also try using gcj to
> natively compile firecat. See
> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/How%20to%20BC%20compile%20with%20GCJ for
> details. Don't forget to pass gcj -O3 for the best effect. :)
>
>
> cheers,
> dalibor topic
>
>> > On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 09:33 +0900, fchoong@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> >> Hi Mark,
>> >> firecat runs on Kaffe 1.1.7(GNU Classpath 0.90) with no problems,
>> except
>> >> for performance(I tried to use it for running sandbox.nihonsoft.org,
>> but
>> >> it turned out to be too slow.). SableVM was ok, but due to changes in
>> >> firecat's classloading structure, it does not work anymore. I am
>> >> planning
>> >> to get JamVM working for the next release(probably need to change the
>> >> startup script, and create some wrappers to make JamVM look like a
>> JDK).
>> >
>> > What architecture is sandbox.nihonsoft.org? I wonder why SableVM was
>> > ok, but not kaffe.
>> >
>> > TWISTI
>> >
>>
>>
>
