On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:55:20AM +0900, fchoong@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Hi Christian, Dalibor, > sandbox.nihonsoft.org is a standard i386(32-bit) machine. There is no > problem with running firecat with Kaffe, except the slow execution speed. > SableVM has some sort of problem with the chaining of classloaders, and > the server socket dies after a few minutes. I think these problems are > specific to the VM, and not GNU Classpath. I have tried JamVM a bit, and > it seems to be ok too(except the way it is packaged is not like a JDK). I > think while some problems are trivial, others are not. But overall we are > getting closer to being able to use Free Runtimes in production;) > David Fu. Cool, thanks for the update. You could also try using gcj to natively compile firecat. See http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/How%20to%20BC%20compile%20with%20GCJ for details. Don't forget to pass gcj -O3 for the best effect. :) cheers, dalibor topic > > On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 09:33 +0900, fchoong@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> Hi Mark, > >> firecat runs on Kaffe 1.1.7(GNU Classpath 0.90) with no problems, except > >> for performance(I tried to use it for running sandbox.nihonsoft.org, but > >> it turned out to be too slow.). SableVM was ok, but due to changes in > >> firecat's classloading structure, it does not work anymore. I am > >> planning > >> to get JamVM working for the next release(probably need to change the > >> startup script, and create some wrappers to make JamVM look like a JDK). > > > > What architecture is sandbox.nihonsoft.org? I wonder why SableVM was > > ok, but not kaffe. > > > > TWISTI > > > >
