Re: Hello:Interested in classpath

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:55:20AM +0900, fchoong@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Hi Christian, Dalibor,
> sandbox.nihonsoft.org is a standard i386(32-bit) machine. There is no
> problem with running firecat with Kaffe, except the slow execution speed.
> SableVM has some sort of problem with the chaining of classloaders, and
> the server socket dies after a few minutes. I think these problems are
> specific to the VM, and not GNU Classpath. I have tried JamVM a bit, and
> it seems to be ok too(except the way it is packaged is not like a JDK). I
> think while some problems are trivial, others are not. But overall we are
> getting closer to being able to use Free Runtimes in production;)
>                                                                 David Fu.

Cool, thanks for the update. You could also try using gcj to
natively compile firecat. See
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/How%20to%20BC%20compile%20with%20GCJ for
details. Don't forget to pass gcj -O3 for the best effect. :)


cheers,
dalibor topic

> > On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 09:33 +0900, fchoong@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >> Hi Mark,
> >> firecat runs on Kaffe 1.1.7(GNU Classpath 0.90) with no problems, except
> >> for performance(I tried to use it for running sandbox.nihonsoft.org, but
> >> it turned out to be too slow.). SableVM was ok, but due to changes in
> >> firecat's classloading structure, it does not work anymore. I am
> >> planning
> >> to get JamVM working for the next release(probably need to change the
> >> startup script, and create some wrappers to make JamVM look like a JDK).
> >
> > What architecture is sandbox.nihonsoft.org?  I wonder why SableVM was
> > ok, but not kaffe.
> >
> > TWISTI
> >
> 
> 


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Cryptography]     [Fedora]     [Fedora Directory]     [Red Hat Development]

  Powered by Linux