Bryce McKinlay wrote: > Roman Kennke wrote: >>> Also, the ability to see/track when a failure started occurring could >>> be very useful. That way we could easily match up new failures with >>> patches that caused them. >>> >> >> Hmm, that's an interesting feature indeed. We would have to keep diffs >> between versions around and teach the script to parse and display them >> somehow. I must think about this a little. >> > > It should become a bit easier with the new test harness. When you treat > 1 test = 1 failure, each pass/fail can be uniquely identified, and > regressions can be distinguished easily from new test cases. Yes, I posted a patch that makes the new harness the default and removes the old one to mauve-patches@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx yesterday. No one has responded thus far, but I'd appreciate comments. Tom
