"Sun Says GPL Is a Possibility for OSS Java"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Casey Marshall <csm@xxxxxxx> writes:

> And in the next sentence he talks about compatibility, which politely  
> seems to be mentioning Sun's fear of forks yet again, which they will  
> probably never drop.

That annoys me because it's nonsense isn't it?

We have an effective fork of Java now - Free VMs + Classpath. The FSF
hasn't signed any legal agreements with Sun and yet we have this Java
implementation. I could take that and new operators or classes or
whatever I liked.
 
It's not a true fork though because Sun claim rights to the name Java
and won't let me call my fork Java. But that's got nothing to do with
licences for source code.

The GPL would be perfect for Java because it reduces the commecial
incentive to fork the product and means that anything developed on it
would be free anyway to be reincorporated if it was any good.


So, to sum up. They're just shyster lawyers. And you know what
Sheakspeare said about them.

-- 
Nic Ferrier
http://www.tapsellferrier.co.uk   for all your tapsell ferrier needs


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Cryptography]     [Fedora]     [Fedora Directory]     [Red Hat Development]

  Powered by Linux