On Jun 1, 2006, at 9:29 AM, Dalibor Topic wrote: > On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 12:49:36PM +0000, theUser BL wrote: >>> At OSNews.com at >>> http://www.osnews.com/comment.php?news_id=14770 >>> stand, that a GPL Java could be possible. >> >> I have now seen, that the links ends up in Suns blog at >> http://blogs.sun.com/jonathan >> >> There he writes: >> "But all in all, a really great week - we're now making serious >> progress on >> open sourcing Java (and despite the cynics, using a GPL license is >> very >> much *on* the table), [...]" >> > > I can't parse that sentence. Is Schwartz leading a tough fight against > evil cynics inside Sun to get the GPL considered? > And in the next sentence he talks about compatibility, which politely seems to be mentioning Sun's fear of forks yet again, which they will probably never drop. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PGP.sig Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 478 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath/attachments/20060601/b8246317/PGP.pgp
