On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 01:49:42PM +0100, Philippe Laporte wrote: > > > Michael Koch wrote: > > >On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 01:28:10PM +0100, Philippe Laporte wrote: > > > > > >>- Sable has a large and active community > >> > >> > > > >In the last time the project seems to be very inactive except some mails > >on the lists. > > > > > > Not true. They just like to keep it low volume for some reason (which I > admittedly don't like much). Check again. > > Anyways, even a community of 2 is better than the JamVM community... Please keep your attacks on other communities and projects on the sablevm lists, where they can be easily ignored. Thank you. cheers, dalibor topic > > > > > > >>- Sable is LGPL. GPL does not work for maemo. Read why at > >>http://sablevm.org/wiki/License_FAQ. > >> > >> > > > >That is only the opinion of the SableVM people. Neither GNU classpath > >poeple nor FSF considers this to be correct. > > > > > > > So why do they still think so after such a long time? What would you say? > > What's the heuristic then? > > If you link native to a GPL VM, then that code must also be GPL, no? > That is an absolute requirement in the embedded world... > > Regards, > > Philippe Laporte > Software > > Gatespace Telematics > F?rsta L?nggatan 18 > 41328 G?teborg > Sweden > Phone: +46 702 04 35 11 > Fax: +46 31 24 16 50 > Email: philippe.laporte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > >
