Michael Koch wrote: >On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 01:28:10PM +0100, Philippe Laporte wrote: > > >>- Sable has a large and active community >> >> > >In the last time the project seems to be very inactive except some mails >on the lists. > > Not true. They just like to keep it low volume for some reason (which I admittedly don't like much). Check again. Anyways, even a community of 2 is better than the JamVM community... > > >>- Sable is LGPL. GPL does not work for maemo. Read why at >>http://sablevm.org/wiki/License_FAQ. >> >> > >That is only the opinion of the SableVM people. Neither GNU classpath >poeple nor FSF considers this to be correct. > > > So why do they still think so after such a long time? What would you say? What's the heuristic then? If you link native to a GPL VM, then that code must also be GPL, no? That is an absolute requirement in the embedded world... Regards, Philippe Laporte Software Gatespace Telematics F?rsta L?nggatan 18 41328 G?teborg Sweden Phone: +46 702 04 35 11 Fax: +46 31 24 16 50 Email: philippe.laporte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
