Michael, I disagree. I have evidence that the FSF considers our interpretation to be correct; at least, Richard Stallman considered it to be correct a few years ago. Our interpretation of the GNU GPL in the context of a JVM is actually based on a long discussion I had with Richard Stallman a few years ago. If you are so convinced that the FSF thinks that our opinion is wrong, please get an email from Richard Stallman or from an FSF lawyer to state the error in the "Complete answer" of the first question of our License FAQ: http://sablevm.org/wiki/License_FAQ Etienne Michael Koch wrote: >>>That is only the opinion of the SableVM people. Neither GNU classpath >>>poeple nor FSF considers this to be correct. -- Etienne M. Gagnon, Ph.D. http://www.info2.uqam.ca/~egagnon/ SableVM: http://www.sablevm.org/ SableCC: http://www.sablecc.org/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 256 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath/attachments/20060307/9171e47c/signature.pgp
