On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 20:01 -0500, Andrew Pinski wrote: > On Feb 1, 2006, at 7:52 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: > > I thought this question was more about "security" in the sense of > > "bugs we know of in our security code", not "security flaws requiring > > a quick turnaround". > > Likewise. After reading Casey's email that Mark responded to. In that case it seems we don't need a keyword or meta-bug but just a new 'security' component covering java.security.* (Permissions, Policies, SecurityManager)? Cheers, Mark -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath/attachments/20060202/bfccd01f/attachment.pgp
