On Feb 1, 2006, at 12:25 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Casey" == Casey Marshall <csm@xxxxxxx> writes: > > Casey> Any thoughts on adding a "crypto" or "security" component to > Casey> Classpath Bugzilla? And maybe a "security" keyword that > describes > Casey> direct security issues? > > For a new component I think we generally want to have a default owner > for the bugs. In any case, if you think it is worthwhile, then I'm > for it. > I can be the default owner of those bugs. Or maybe Raif, if he wants to. The two of us wrote the bulk of the crypto code. > For security right now we have a meta-bug which depends on all the > security issues -- PR 13603. This is a bit weird since this predates > classpath using bugzilla, and is filed against gcj. > > I don't know the pros and cons of meta-bugs versus keywords. I'm > fine with whatever works. > That's not a big deal. It's just that crypto/ssl is a large part of Classpath now, so it makes sense that it have it's own component (and bugs!).
