On Feb 1, 2006, at 5:01 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote: > On Feb 1, 2006, at 7:52 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: >> I thought this question was more about "security" in the sense of >> "bugs we know of in our security code", not "security flaws requiring >> a quick turnaround". > > Likewise. After reading Casey's email that Mark responded to. > Yeah, that was what I meant. Because the Java security model potentially touches everything, and isn't exactly a "component."
