On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 10:23 -0400, Ron Salyers wrote: > In the documentation it says that the Crux window frame option loads > image files and can be slow on systems with limited resources. It lists > Atlanta, Esco, AgingGorilla, Bright, and Metabox as other options. I am > using Red Hat AS 4 and it defaults to Bluecurve. Is this one going to > fall under the category of less resource intensive? The machines I'm > configuring could have anywhere from 40 go 60 users with X sessions > running on it. The machines are plenty powerful enough to handle this > many users, but I'm wondering if changing the theme from Bluecurve is > going to make a noticeable difference in performance to my users? To test performance of a theme, checkout metacity-theme-viewer <theme> # metacity-theme-viewer Mist > > Thanks, > > Ron > _______________________________________________ > gnome-list mailing list > gnome-list@xxxxxxxxx > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-list -- Ritesh Khadgaray LinuX N Stuff Ph: +919822394463 Eat Right, Exercise, Die Anyway. _______________________________________________ gnome-list mailing list gnome-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-list
