Re: performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Danti,

the notes are not very verbose, but looks like the following lines were removed from their virtualization config:

  <relaxed state='on'/>
  <vapic state='on'/>
  <spinlocks state='on' retries='8191'/>

They also enabled hyperthreading, so having 12 "cores" instead of 6 now. Guessing that had a lot to do with it...

On 2020-09-04 8:20 a.m., Gionatan Danti wrote:
Il 2020-09-04 01:00 Computerisms Corporation ha scritto:
For the sake of completeness I am reporting back that your suspicions
seem to have been validated.  I talked to the data center, they made
some changes.  we talked again some days later, and they made some
more changes, and for several days now load average on both machines
is staying consistently below 5 on both servers.  I still have some
issues to deal with, but the performance of the machines are now no
longer a problem.

Great! Any chances to know *what* they did change?
Thanks.

________



Community Meeting Calendar:

Schedule -
Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC
Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/441850968

Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux