----- Original Message ----- > From: "Niklas Hambüchen" <mail@xxxxxx> > To: "Sam McLeod" <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2017 7:34:15 PM > Subject: Re: Confusing lstat() performance > > I found the reason now, at least for this set of lstat()s I was looking at. > > bup first does all getdents(), obtaining all file names in the > directory, and then stat()s them. +1 I was thinking of a case just like this. -b > > Apparently this destroys some of gluster's caching, making stat()s ~100x > slower. > > What caching could this be, and how could I convince gluster to serve > these stat()s as fast as if a getdents() had been done just before them? > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
