Re: Confusing lstat() performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 17/09/17 18:03, Niklas Hambüchen wrote:
> So far the only difference between `ls` and `bup index` I could observe
> is that `bup index` chdir()s into the directory to index, ls doesn't.
> 
> But when I `cd` into the dir and run `ls` without directory argument, it
> is still much faster than bup index for each stat().

Hmm, bup uses the fchdir() syscall to go into the target directory.
Might that make a difference for gluster?
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux