On 17/09/17 18:03, Niklas Hambüchen wrote: > So far the only difference between `ls` and `bup index` I could observe > is that `bup index` chdir()s into the directory to index, ls doesn't. > > But when I `cd` into the dir and run `ls` without directory argument, it > is still much faster than bup index for each stat(). Hmm, bup uses the fchdir() syscall to go into the target directory. Might that make a difference for gluster? _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users