Re: Confusing lstat() performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Note, I have now put out a patch for bup that makes it 50x faster on my
1M files on gluster, exploiting the fact that stat() is fast after
getdents() on it:

  https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/bup-list/6CM7Jr7b_Ek

I'd still be interested in answers to this question though:

> What caching could this be, and how could I convince gluster to serve
> these stat()s as fast as if a getdents() had been done just before them?
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux