OK, at least its not an *issue* with Gluster. I didn't expect any
but you never know. I have been amused at the 'lack' of discussion on Teaming
performance found on Google searches. There are lots of 'here it is and here is how to set it up' articles/posts, but no 'ooh-wee-wow it is awesome' comments. It seems that for most people Bonding has worked it kinks out and
thus serves its purpose perfectly fine, so no reason to change to
Teaming. That or they had Mahdi's experience with Teaming in its present
state and bonding just works better for now. Among the 'advantages' claimed for Teaming is the lower performance overhead (though "low vs very-low" may not be significant) https://github.com/jpirko/libteam/wiki/Bonding-vs.-Team-features Thanks all for the feedback. I'll let everyone know if my testing happens and if it is a significant difference (good or bad). -bill On 6/19/2017 6:27 AM, David Gossage
wrote:
|
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users