Re: Teaming vs Bond?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I haven't done any testing of performance differences, but on my oVirt/rhev i use standard bonding as that's that it supports.  On the stand along gluster nodes I use teaming for bonding.

Teaming may be slightly easier to manage, but not by much if you are already used to bond setups.  I haven't noticed any bugs or issues using teaming.

David Gossage
Carousel Checks Inc. | System Administrator
Office 708.613.2284

On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 2:59 PM, wk <wkmail@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm looking at tuning up a new site and the bonding issue came up

A google search reveals that the gluster docs (and Lindsay) recommend balance-alb bonding.

However, "team"ing came up which I wasn't familiar with. Its already in RH6/7 and Ubuntu and their Github page implies its stable.

The libteam.org people seem to feel their solution is more lightweight and it seems easy enough to setup.

Before I go down this path, I was curious if anyone had any experience/comments with 'team'

It would be nice to get a little speed bump essentially for free.

-bill




_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux