Re: Comparison with other SDS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 14/11/2016 9:00 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote:
Can someone explain me why Lizard is 10 times faster than gluster?
This is not a flame, I would only like to know the technical
differences between these two software

Its my understanding that with many/small file operations involving directory lookup etc on disperse volumes gluster has to check each directory on each brick set, which leads to very high latencies. This is where a metadata server is an advantage I guess.


Of course if you're running a replica <n> volume, non-dispersed you should only need to do lookups locally. It would be interesting to know if thats a optimization gluster does.

--
Lindsay Mathieson

_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux