Re: Comparison with other SDS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2016-11-14 12:51 GMT+01:00 Lindsay Mathieson <lindsay.mathieson@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Of course if you're running a replica <n> volume, non-dispersed you should
> only need to do lookups locally. It would be interesting to know if thats a
> optimization gluster does.

I have a replica 2 with only 2 bricks, there is nothing to "disperse" :)
Probably, Lizard is faster because replication is made by each
chunkserver and not by the client
http://moosefs.org/tl_files/mfs_folder/write862.png
(image for MooseFS, but Lizard is a fork, it replicate in the same way)
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux