Re: Production cluster planning

[mabi <mabi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry the link is missing in my previous post:

https://groups.google.com/a/zfsonlinux.org/d/msg/zfs-discuss/OI5dchl7d_8/vLRMZgJGYUoJ

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Production cluster planning

Local Time: September 30, 2016 8:15 PM

UTC Time: September 30, 2016 6:15 PM

From: mabi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

To: Gluster Users <gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Gluster Users <gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>

The data will not be in "any" state as you mention or please define what you mean by "any". In the worst case you will just loose 5 seconds of data that's all as far as I understand.

Here is another very interesting but long post regarding this topic. Basically it all boils down to this specific

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Production cluster planning

Local Time: September 30, 2016 12:41 PM

UTC Time: September 30, 2016 10:41 AM

From: lindsay.mathieson@xxxxxxxxx

To: mabi <mabi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Gluster Users <gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>

On 29/09/2016 4:32 AM, mabi wrote:

> hat's not correct. There is no risk of corruption using

> "sync=disabled". In the worst case you just end up with old data but

> no corruption. See the following comment from a master of ZFS (Aaron

> Toponce):

>

> https://pthree.org/2013/01/25/glusterfs-linked-list-topology/#comment-227906

Your missing what he said - *ZFS* will not be corrupted but the data

written could be in any state, in this case the gluster filesystem data

and meta data. To have one ndoe in a cluster out of sync with out the

cluster knowing would be very bad.

--

Lindsay Mathieson

_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users