On 29/09/2016 4:32 AM, mabi wrote:
hat's not correct. There is no risk of corruption using
"sync=disabled". In the worst case you just end up with old data but
no corruption. See the following comment from a master of ZFS (Aaron
Toponce):
https://pthree.org/2013/01/25/glusterfs-linked-list-topology/#comment-227906
Your missing what he said - *ZFS* will not be corrupted but the data
written could be in any state, in this case the gluster filesystem data
and meta data. To have one ndoe in a cluster out of sync with out the
cluster knowing would be very bad.
--
Lindsay Mathieson
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
