On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Ben Werthmann <ben@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yes, I'm testing and developing minio/gluster as a replacement for > Riak/Riak-CS. Minio seems pretty simple to operate thus far. > however simple minio is, it doesnt support clustering, replication or multiple users. replacing RIAK with minio... FAIL! riak and skylable by far are better suited. > Presently. there's an Erasure Code storage backend that is limited to a > single Minio instance at this time. > https://docs.minio.io/docs/minio-erasure-code-quickstart-guide > > Distributed ("multi-instance") EC backend is WIP: > https://github.com/minio/minio/milestone/10 > https://github.com/minio/minio/milestone/11 > > One issue to be aware of: > https://github.com/minio/minio/issues/2640#issuecomment-245704477 > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta > <gandalf.corvotempesta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Anyone tried Minio as object storage over gluster? >> It mostly a one-liner: >> https://docs.minio.io/docs/minio-quickstart-guide >> >> something like: >> ./minio server /mnt/my_gluster_volume >> >> Having an Amazon S3 compatible object store could be great in some >> environments >> _______________________________________________ >> Gluster-users mailing list >> Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx >> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
