Worked fine for me actually.
# md5sum lastlog
ab7557d582484a068c3478e342069326 lastlog
# rsync -avH lastlog /mnt/
sending incremental file list
lastlog
sent 364,001,522 bytes received 35 bytes 48,533,540.93 bytes/sec
total size is 363,912,592 speedup is 1.00
# cd /mnt
# md5sum lastlog
ab7557d582484a068c3478e342069326 lastlog
-Krutika# md5sum lastlog
ab7557d582484a068c3478e342069326 lastlog
# rsync -avH lastlog /mnt/
sending incremental file list
lastlog
sent 364,001,522 bytes received 35 bytes 48,533,540.93 bytes/sec
total size is 363,912,592 speedup is 1.00
# cd /mnt
# md5sum lastlog
ab7557d582484a068c3478e342069326 lastlog
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 8:21 AM, Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
-KrutikaHi,What version of gluster are you using?
Also, could you share your volume configuration (`gluster volume info`)?On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 6:58 AM, Ravishankar N <ravishankar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On 09/28/2016 12:16 AM, ML Wong wrote:
Hello Ravishankar,Thanks for introducing the sharding feature to me.It does seems to resolve the problem i was encountering earlier. But I have 1 question, do we expect the checksum of the file to be different if i copy from directory A to a shard-enabled volume?
No the checksums must match. Perhaps Krutika who works on Sharding (CC'ed) can help you figure out why that isn't the case here.
-Ravi
[xxxxx@ip-172-31-1-72 ~]$ sudo sha1sum /var/tmp/oVirt-Live-4.0.4.isoea8472f6408163fa9a315d878c651a519fc3f438 /var/tmp/oVirt-Live-4.0.4.iso [xxxxx@ip-172-31-1-72 ~]$ sudo rsync -avH /var/tmp/oVirt-Live-4.0.4.iso /mnt/sending incremental file listoVirt-Live-4.0.4.iso
sent 1373802342 bytes received 31 bytes 30871963.44 bytes/sectotal size is 1373634560 speedup is 1.00[xxxxx@ip-172-31-1-72 ~]$ sudo sha1sum /mnt/oVirt-Live-4.0.4.iso14e9064857b40face90c91750d79c4d8665b9cab /mnt/oVirt-Live-4.0.4.iso
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Ravishankar N <ravishankar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 09/27/2016 05:15 AM, ML Wong wrote:
Have anyone in the list who has tried copying file which is bigger than the individual brick/replica size?Test Scenario:Distributed-Replicated volume, 2GB size, 2x2 = 4 bricks, 2 replicasEach replica has 1GB
When i tried to copy file this volume, by both fuse, or nfs mount. i get I/O error.Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on/dev/mapper/vg0-brick1 1017M 33M 985M 4% /data/brick1/dev/mapper/vg0-brick2 1017M 109M 909M 11% /data/brick2lbre-cloud-dev1:/sharevol1 2.0G 141M 1.9G 7% /sharevol1
[xxxxxx@cloud-dev1 ~]$ du -sh /var/tmp/ovirt-live-el7-3.6.2.iso 1.3G /var/tmp/ovirt-live-el7-3.6.2.iso
[melvinw@lbre-cloud-dev1 ~]$ sudo cp /var/tmp/ovirt-live-el7-3.6.2.iso /sharevol1/ cp: error writing ‘/sharevol1/ovirt-live-el7-3.6.2.iso’: Input/output error cp: failed to extend ‘/sharevol1/ovirt-live-el7-3.6.2.iso’: Input/output error cp: failed to close ‘/sharevol1/ovirt-live-el7-3.6.2.iso’: Input/output error
Does the mount log give you more information? It it was a disk full issue, the error you would get is ENOSPC and not EIO. This looks like something else.
It is recommended to use sharding (http://blog.gluster.org/2015/
I know, we have experts in this mailing list. And, i assume, this is a common situation where many Gluster users may have encountered. The worry i have what if you have a big VM file sitting on top of Gluster volume ...?
12/introducing-shard-translato ) for VM workloads to alleviate these kinds of issues.r/
-Ravi
Any insights will be much appreciated.
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman /listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users