Re: New cluster - first experience

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempesta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
2016-07-13 10:24 GMT+02:00 Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> We are in the process of making shard available for general purpose
> usecases.

Any ETA?

Design hasn't finalized so hard to tell.
 

Anyway, i did another test. This time the "client" has 4 bonded
gigabit nic (balance-rr) and each server has 2 bonded gigabit nic
(balance-rr). (previously i had an issue with bonding on our switch)

With sharding (64MB):
# echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches; dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=1M
count=1000 conv=fsync
1000+0 record dentro
1000+0 record fuori
1048576000 byte (1,0 GB) copiati, 89,2066 s, 11,8 MB/s


Without sharding:
# echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches; dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=1M
count=1000 conv=fsync
1000+0 record dentro
1000+0 record fuori
1048576000 byte (1,0 GB) copiati, 17,759 s, 59,0 MB/s

WOW! But still far away from HDD speed (about 120MB/s)


With 4 bonded nic, I have 4000gbit of bandwidth.
4000/8 = 500MB/s
With this configuration gluster should be able to write at full speed
on 3 nodes at once.
Each node has 2000/8 = 250MB/s of bandwidth, twice the hdd speed.
If you do a plain nfs mount of the brick without any gluster in picture what is the speed you get?


--
Pranith
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux