2016-07-13 10:24 GMT+02:00 Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx>: > We are in the process of making shard available for general purpose > usecases. Any ETA? Anyway, i did another test. This time the "client" has 4 bonded gigabit nic (balance-rr) and each server has 2 bonded gigabit nic (balance-rr). (previously i had an issue with bonding on our switch) With sharding (64MB): # echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches; dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=1M count=1000 conv=fsync 1000+0 record dentro 1000+0 record fuori 1048576000 byte (1,0 GB) copiati, 89,2066 s, 11,8 MB/s Without sharding: # echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches; dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=1M count=1000 conv=fsync 1000+0 record dentro 1000+0 record fuori 1048576000 byte (1,0 GB) copiati, 17,759 s, 59,0 MB/s WOW! But still far away from HDD speed (about 120MB/s) With 4 bonded nic, I have 4000gbit of bandwidth. 4000/8 = 500MB/s With this configuration gluster should be able to write at full speed on 3 nodes at once. Each node has 2000/8 = 250MB/s of bandwidth, twice the hdd speed. _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users