Another typo has been pointed out and this one I can't blame on auto-correct. The storage size will 5TB, not 5GB. John On 20/03/14 11:48, John Gardeniers wrote: > That title should say "brick", not "bring". I thought I had auto-correct > disabled. Sorry. > > On 20/03/14 11:44, John Gardeniers wrote: >> Having experimented with Gluster for the last month I'm now ready to >> create a set-up for production. This will be the storing VM images. >> These are less than 100GB each, with the majority being around 20BG. >> >> The plan is to have 5GB of storage using a replication pair to allow for >> fail-over, with geo-replication to another server for backup purposes. >> The underlying disks on each server are RAID 10. >> >> Am I better off creating a single 5GB brick on each server or would >> there be advantages in creating several smaller bricks? >> >> Thanks, >> John >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gluster-users mailing list >> Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx >> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >> >> ______________________________________________________________________ >> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. >> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com >> ______________________________________________________________________ > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. > For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com > ______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
