Re: Use single large bring or several smaller ones?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



That title should say "brick", not "bring". I thought I had auto-correct
disabled. Sorry.

On 20/03/14 11:44, John Gardeniers wrote:
> Having experimented with Gluster for the last month I'm now ready to
> create a set-up for production.  This will be the storing VM images.
> These are less than 100GB each, with the majority being around 20BG.
>
> The plan is to have 5GB of storage using a replication pair to allow for
> fail-over, with geo-replication to another server for backup purposes.
> The underlying disks on each server are RAID 10.
>
> Am I better off creating a single 5GB brick on each server or would
> there be advantages in creating several smaller bricks?
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
> ______________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux