Re: Regarding Replicated Volume

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I'm fairly confident that the docs are talking about this:

1) it's not recommended to have replicated bricks accross long distances
(am not from US so I don't know the exact distance between Seattle and
Chapel Hill, but it sounds far haha)
2) would geo-replication be the way to go?

Anybody correct me if this is not so!
..maybe give the docs one more go?

v


On Wed 19 Mar 2014 12:06:37, Cary Tsai wrote:
> Hi There:
> New to the GlusterFS and could not find the answer from the document
> so hope I can get the answer form the mailing list.
> 
> Let's say we have two web servers:
> One in Seattle, WA and another one is in Chapel Hill, NC.
> So I create a 'replicated' volume which one brick in WA and another brick
> in NC.
> I assume the web server in both WA and NC can mount the 'replicated' volume.
> There are 2 HTTP/Get calls from CA and NY.
> We assume CA's HTTP/Get is sent to web server in WA and
> NY's HTTP/Get is sent to web server in NC.
> 
> My question is does the web server in WA definitely gets the data
> from the brick in WA? If not, is any way to configure so the
> web server in WA definitely gets data from the brick in WA?
> 
> Thanks

> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users


-- 
Regards

Viktor Villafuerte
Optus Internet Engineering
t: 02 808-25265
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux