Re: GlusterFS was removed from Fedora EPEL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/04/2013 08:22 AM, Paul Simpson wrote:

I was thinking to upgrade to 3.4.x in the next month or so. I'd like to
understand more - how many people are actually using 3.4.1? Can anyone
(users) or from gluster/redhat chime in here - would be reassuring to
hear that the latest version is also the greatest..

Well, obviously we here at Red Hat do think that 3.4.1 is the best version to use; second perhaps only to RHS. ;-)

(BTW, GlusterFS 3.4.2 will be out in a week or two. That'll be even better.)

Since the beginning of November — as far back as our httpd logs go — there have been over 1.3M downloads of glusterfs 3.4.1 files from download.gluster.org. I don't put too much stock in that number though because on Debian/Ubuntu glusterfs is comprised of four .debs, and on Fedora/EPEL it's comprised of twelve RPMs. Plus there are the repo files too. And since glusterfs 3.4.1 is in Fedora 18-20 we have no visibility into how many installs there are from Fedora and all its mirrors.

--

Kaleb
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users





[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux